Free downloadable template

Founder Contribution Valuation Worksheet

Create a shared evidence base for a difficult valuation conversation without pretending that one score determines ownership.

Built for founder commitment decisions

Use this template when

Founder teams preparing an equity discussion and seeking a transparent comparison of different contribution types.

Template preview

The downloaded Word file includes the same sections below, so you can review the structure before saving it.

1. Contribution categories

Agreed categories reduce bias by making founders evaluate the same kinds of contribution rather than defending only their own strengths.

  • Time and execution category: [Definition]
  • Domain expertise category: [Definition]
  • Capital and financial risk category: [Definition]
  • IP, network, or distribution category: [Definition]

2. Evidence period

A defined evidence window keeps old promises and one-off efforts from outweighing recent, relevant founder behavior.

  • Measurement start and end: [Dates]
  • Eligible work products: [Examples]
  • Evidence sources: [Logs, documents, outcomes]
  • Excluded claims: [Examples]

3. Weighting method

Weights expose priorities so the team can debate what matters before seeing which founder benefits from the method.

  • Category weights: [Percentages]
  • Scoring scale: [Range and anchors]
  • How uncertainty is marked: [Rule]
  • Who validates evidence: [Names or advisor]

4. Founder scoring

Independent scoring followed by comparison reveals assumption gaps more clearly than negotiating a single number in real time.

  • Founder scored: [Name]
  • Scores by category: [Scores]
  • Evidence supporting each score: [References]
  • Confidence level: [High, medium, or low]

5. Gap discussion

The largest scoring gaps deserve attention because they often reveal different definitions of effort, impact, or risk.

  • Largest score difference: [Category]
  • Underlying assumption: [Difference]
  • Evidence still needed: [Item]
  • Experiment or review to resolve it: [Action]

6. Recorded conclusion

Recording the conclusion and its limits prevents a discussion aid from being mistaken for a binding ownership decision.

  • Shared conclusion: [Summary]
  • Questions left unresolved: [List]
  • Advisor review required: [Yes and scope]
  • Next decision date: [Date]

Disclaimer

This worksheet is a decision aid, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Its scores do not establish value or ownership; seek qualified advice before acting.

Download, adapt, then validate the partnership

A template helps you structure the conversation. CofounderFit helps you test whether the partnership can survive the conversation before equity, vesting, and commitment are final.

Related founder tools

Founder Contribution Valuation Worksheet FAQ

When is a founder contribution valuation worksheet useful?

Use it before negotiating an initial split or revisiting a provisional split when the team needs evidence instead of competing narratives.

Who should score founder contributions?

All affected founders should score independently and compare reasoning; an impartial advisor can help when evidence or definitions remain disputed.

Why should founders avoid treating the score as a valuation?

The weighting is a conversation device, not a market or legal valuation, and it cannot capture every ownership, tax, or company-structure factor.

Legal disclaimer

This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or professional advice. Laws and enforceability vary by jurisdiction. Have any final agreement reviewed by a qualified professional before signing.